New93 role standards, now public
MedTality
Role standards

Front office and patient access

Referral coordinator

What it takes to move a referral safely from a clinician's order to a completed specialist visit: honouring the ordering clinician's urgency instead of second-guessing it, verifying coverage and authorization before the visit is booked, exchanging records only through verified channels and only as far as the specific request needs, and following every referral to a real outcome rather than letting it go quiet. Weighted from the NAHAM Certified Healthcare Access Associate content outline, the closest verified certification content that covers this front-line coordination work.

Expectations
10
Safety red lines
4
Sources
3
Version
1

Built from National Association of Healthcare Access Management, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Reviewed by clinicians, last on .

01What the role is measured on#

Every verdict is made of the same five dimensions. Each is scored on its own, so a candidate sees where they are strong and where to work.

  • Clinical skillsThe hands-on and judgement work of the role: recognising what matters, acting in the right order, and knowing when something cannot wait.
  • Workflow and toolsGetting the work done in a real setting: the systems, records, equipment and handoffs the role runs on, used correctly and on time.
  • Patient communicationHow the role talks with patients, families and colleagues: listening, explaining plainly, and confirming what was understood.
  • Compliance and safetyThe rules that protect people: privacy, consent, infection control, reporting duties and the safety checks the role is accountable for.
  • Role knowledgeKnowing the job itself: what the role is responsible for, where its scope ends, and who to bring in when it does.

02What a ready hire does#

What a competent referral coordinator does on day one, dimension by dimension.

Clinical skills

  • Moves a referral from the clinician's order to a scheduled, confirmed specialist visit that matches the ordering clinician's urgency and requirements, and does not let it stall silently.
  • Knows what a prior authorization needs to succeed - the payer's specific criteria, the supporting documentation, and the decision clock - and gets a complete request moving before it delays the visit.

Workflow and tools

  • Confirms the patient's coverage, the specialist's network status, and any authorization the payer requires before the referral is scheduled, so the visit does not fail on arrival or leave the patient with a surprise bill.
  • Documents and tracks referrals and authorizations in the record accurately, without creating duplicate entries or losing the trail between the order and its outcome.

Patient communication

  • Explains the referral process, what the patient needs to do, and what they will pay, in plain language the patient can act on, and checks it landed.
  • Writes messages to specialists' offices and payers that state the patient, the request, and what is needed clearly enough to act on without a phone call.

Compliance and safety

  • Sends and receives patient information for a referral or authorization only through verified channels, and shares no more than the specific request needs.
  • Confirms a patient's identity with at least two identifiers before opening, discussing or sending their information, every time.

Role knowledge

  • Follows a referral or authorization until it reaches a real outcome - the visit happened, the authorization was granted or denied, or the patient was reached with a decision - and escalates rather than letting it quietly go stale.
  • Recognises which decisions belong to a clinician, a payer, or the patient, and routes those questions instead of answering them.

03Safety red lines#

Any one of these keeps a candidate from Ready Day One, whatever the rest of the score. They are published so nobody meets them for the first time in the assessment.

  • Downgrades or overrides the ordering clinician's stated urgency on their own judgment - for example booking an urgent referral into a routine slot weeks out because the coordinator thinks it can wait - instead of going back to the clinician when the timeframe cannot be met.

    Urgency is the ordering clinician's clinical judgment, not the coordinator's; substituting their own read of a symptom for that judgment can leave a patient with a serious, time-sensitive condition waiting far longer than anyone with authority to make that call intended.

  • Sends more of a patient's record than the receiving office's specific request needs, or sends records to a fax number, email address or portal that has not been verified as belonging to the intended recipient.

    This is a disclosure beyond the minimum necessary and, when the destination is unverified, a misdirected release of protected health information to an unknown party - both a HIPAA violation and, for the patient, information about their care reaching someone it should not.

  • States or enters a clinical fact - a diagnosis, a symptom, a prior therapy or its outcome - on a prior authorization or eligibility submission that the patient's record does not actually contain, so the request is more likely to be approved.

    A submission built on facts the record does not support is a false statement to a payer, which is fraud, and can approve a visit or service on grounds that were never clinically established.

  • Marks a referral complete, or stops tracking it, without confirming the patient actually attended the visit or that an authorization reached a real decision.

    A referral recorded as done that never happened leaves a patient believing their care is handled when nobody is actually watching for it, and the ordering clinician is told, in effect, that a loop closed that never did.

04Outside the role#

Knowing where the role stops is part of the standard. Going past it is not extra credit.

  • Does not decide on their own judgment whether a referral's urgency can be downgraded, or how urgently a patient needs to be seen.Follows the ordering clinician's stated urgency, and goes back to the clinician - not the patient - when the urgency or the reason for the referral is unclear, or when a specialist cannot meet the stated timeframe.
  • Does not choose which specialist, treatment or diagnostic path a patient needs, or tell a patient what a symptom means.Routes to the specialist and service the order specifies, and refers a request to change either back to the ordering clinician.
  • Does not send more than the minimum necessary information to a receiving office, payer or caller, and does not send records to an unverified fax, email or portal.Confirms the destination against a verified directory or a known contact before sending, sends only what the specific request needs, and reports a misdirected disclosure to the privacy officer immediately.
  • Does not tell a patient whether a prior authorization will be approved, or promise an outcome a payer has not decided.Explains the process and the current status honestly, and follows up with the patient when a decision is due.
  • Does not write or alter clinical documentation to support a referral or authorization.Routes a documentation gap back to the ordering clinician's office and asks for the specific missing item, without suggesting what it should say.

05How it is assessed#

  • A spoken assessment

    An examiner talks the candidate through realistic cases from this role, and follows up the way a senior colleague would.

  • Five dimensions

    Each answer is read against the expectations above and rated on the same four-level scale.

  • The 70 bar

    Every scorecard shows the score against 70, overall and for each dimension, with the reason for the verdict.

  • Safety first

    Crossing one of the safety red lines holds a pass back, however strong the rest was.

The four levels

  1. Not yet
  2. Developing
  3. Proficient
  4. Exemplary
How a verdict is made

06Sources and review#

See who is ready on day one.

Post your next role and meet candidates through their evidence, not their resumes.